July 18, 2025

State Supreme Court won't dismiss latest disciplinary complaint against Attorney General Todd Rokita

Article origination IPB News
The Indiana Supreme Court unanimously decided not to dismiss a disciplinary complaint against Attorney General Todd Rokita, allowing the complaint process to move forward. - Lauren Chapman / IPB News

The Indiana Supreme Court unanimously decided not to dismiss a disciplinary complaint against Attorney General Todd Rokita, allowing the complaint process to move forward.

Lauren Chapman / IPB News

The Indiana Supreme Court Friday denied Attorney General Todd Rokita's request to dismiss a disciplinary complaint against him.

The court's decision means the standard disciplinary process will move forward.

The background of the latest complaint goes back years. In 2023, the state Supreme Court publicly reprimanded Rokita for his remarks about Dr. Caitlin Bernard after she provided abortion care to a 10-year-old Ohio rape victim. As part of that, the attorney general signed an affidavit admitting to violating professional conduct rules and accepting responsibility.

But in a statement immediately following the reprimand, Rokita said he admitted to the misconduct to "save a lot of taxpayer money and distraction," while maintaining he did nothing wrong.

The state disciplinary commission then filed new discipline charges earlier this year. It argued Rokita's statement contradicted the signed affidavit and that his statements since then demonstrate his "lack of candor and dishonesty" to the Supreme Court.

READ MORE: Rokita accuses state disciplinary commission of 'aiding and abetting' his political opponents
 

Join the conversation and sign up for our weekly text group: the Indiana Two-Way. Your comments and questions help us find the answers you need on statewide issues, including our project Civically, Indiana.
 

Rokita asked the court to dismiss the latest complaint. The Supreme Court declined to do so, saying it's extremely rare to dismiss a complaint at this stage.

It directed the complaint process to move forward with the appointment of a hearing officer — or, in this case, three hearing officers. The court said a three-person panel will help avoid the appearance of political pressure influencing a single hearing officer's decisions.

The court's ruling also recommends that the disciplinary commission and Rokita try to resolve the dispute through mediation before a hearing is necessary.
 

Brandon is our Statehouse bureau chief. Contact him at bsmith@ipbs.org or follow him on Twitter at @brandonjsmith5.

Support independent journalism today. You rely on WFYI to stay informed, and we depend on you to make our work possible. Donate to power our nonprofit reporting today. Give now.

 

Related News

Indiana's unemployment rate improves for fifth consecutive month
Defense letter confirms Indiana’s Camp Atterbury to be used for immigrant detention
Congress rolls back $9 billion in public media funding and foreign aid