Federal appeals court judges want the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on a question posed by an Indiana anti-abortion law.

Attorney General Curtis Hill wants a federal court to rehear his appeal of a decision that halted enforcement of a 2017 anti-abortion bill.

Its the 11th time in the last three years the state lost in court over anti-abortion measures.

Another Indiana anti-abortion law has been at least temporarily halted by a federal judge.

A federal judge in Indianapolis will hear arguments Monday over the latest lawsuit challenging an Indiana anti-abortion law.

The 2019 law largely bans the second trimester procedures known as dilation and evacuation abortions, or D&Es.

The nation's high court left in place an appellate ruling that struck down part of a 2016 Indiana law that banned abortions performed because of a fetus's characteristics, such as gender or disability.

An anti-abortion measure required medical facilities to bury or cremate fetal remains, rather than dispose of them as medical waste. It also banned abortions performed because of a fetus's characteristics.

The court left in place a place lower-court ruling that struck down the law that would have barred abortions for reasons of disability of the fetus or for race or sex.

In the latest suit challenging a new law that largely bans a second trimester abortion procedure Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry wants a city lawyer to represent his office.