June 1, 2016

Appeals Court Ruling Could Undercut Mandatory Arbitration

Epic headquarters in Verona, Wisconsin. - public domain

Epic headquarters in Verona, Wisconsin.

public domain

A federal court in Chicago handed down a big win for workers last week. It said a Wisconsin tech company cannot stop employees from filing group labor lawsuits -- and that could have effects in Indiana.

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Madison-based Epic Systems couldn't make employees waive their right to team up in court.

It nullified the arbitration agreement workers signed when they were hired, on the grounds it infringed on a federally protected right.

And that could have broader implications for arbitration agreements, which Indiana University professor Chuck Davis says more companies have required as a condition for employment in recent years.

"Part of the goal, ideally, would that this process would become more efficient, more speedy, less costly for both parties to get things done," Davis says. But, he adds, some contracts are so broad that they discourage workers from complaining at all.

That was the federal finding against the home improvement chain Menard’s in April, stemming from a complaint by an Indiana worker.

Davis thinks more cases like that -- or a stronger court precedent -- could force companies to narrow their use of arbitration agreements. An appeal of the Epic Systems ruling would send that case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Support independent journalism today. You rely on WFYI to stay informed, and we depend on you to make our work possible. Donate to power our nonprofit reporting today. Give now.

 

Related News

EPA announces new rules to increase oversight, regulation of toxic coal ash waste in Indiana
April 25 is the deadline to request a mail-in ballot for Indiana's 2024 primary
Indiana GOP gubernatorial candidates spar with moderator, each other in final debate; Braun absent