June 5, 2015

LGBT Advocates Waiting for Supreme Court Ruling On Marriage Equality

LGBT advocates say they’re waiting on pins and needles for a U.S. Supreme Court ruling later this month on marriage equality.  But, they say regardless of the outcome, there’s more work to be done.

Ohioan Jim Obergefell married his husband, John Arthur, in Maryland in 2013.  But when John died a short time later, Ohio didn’t allow Obergefell to be recognized as Arthur’s husband on the death certificate.  The ensuing court case is now before the U.S. Supreme Court and could ultimately legalize same sex marriage across the country.  But Obergefell says even if his suit is successful, he knows marriage equality isn’t enough.

“To this day, there is still no federal law that says LGBT people can’t be discriminated against in employment, in housing, and in public places,” Obergefell said.

While Obergefell fights for LGBT civil rights at the federal level, advocates in Indiana will soon wage their own battle at the state level.  Karen Vaughn-Kajmowicz and her wife Tammy were two of the plaintiffs whose suit against the state secured marriage equality for LGBT Hoosiers last year.

“Today, I stand before you a married woman and I’m so grateful," Vaughn-Kajmowicz said. "But I also know that our fight isn’t over.”

Legislative leaders say they expect a debate next session over adding LGBT protections to the state’s civil rights statute.

Support independent journalism today. You rely on WFYI to stay informed, and we depend on you to make our work possible. Donate to power our nonprofit reporting today. Give now.

 

Related News

Debate continues over move to make it illegal to sleep on public property
Indy leaders celebrate road funding bill headed for Gov. Braun's desk
An Indiana Girl Scout's push to repeal the 'period tax' might be thwarted by a tight budget