NewsPublic Affairs / March 2, 2016

Proposed Amendement Would Create Financial Penalties For Companies That Move Out Of Indiana

The amendment would allow local governments to get back property tax incentives granted to a company, if the company moves out of the state.Indiana House, property taxes, Indiana legislature, tax incentives2016-03-02T00:00:00-05:00
Proposed Amendement Would Create Financial Penalties For Companies That Move Out Of Indiana

Rep. Tim Brown, R-Crawfordsville, urging the House to vote against an amendment that would give companies a property tax bill if they decide to move out of Indiana.

Jasmine Otam/TheStatehouseFile.com

INDIANAPOLIS — An amendment would create a new financial penalty for companies that leave Indiana to move to foreign countries.

“Today’s vote represents a chance for the members of the Indiana General Assembly to tell companies that they do not have the right to take full advantage of taxpayer-funded assistance to locate in our state, only to abandon us to move out of the country when they get a better deal for their shareholders,” Rep. Karlee Macer, D-Indianapolis, said. “They cannot do it without repaying us for some of what they have taken.”

The amendment would allow local governments to get back property tax incentives granted to a company, if the company moves out of the state. The company would have to pay back the amount of property taxes they originally hadn’t been required to pay.

In February, United Technologies announced it would be closing two Indiana Carrier plants and move those operations to Mexico, a move that would put some 2,100 Hoosiers out of work. According to Macer, the company had received millions in taxpayer-funded assistance.

Macer introduced the amendment to Senate Bill 308, but it wasn’t completely welcomed in the House Tuesday.

House sponsor of SB 308, Rep. Tim Brown, R-Crawfordsville, urged his fellow members of the House to not adopt this amendment

“Property tax can all be done by local ordinances,” he said.

“Locals can put these in the abatement ordinances or abatement agreements that they do with a business going forward,” said Brown.

But House Minority Leader Scott Pelath, D-Michigan City, said the state needs to stand up for itself.

“This amendment is extraordinarily simple,” said Pelath. “If we give you a bunch of taxpayer help, and you say you’re moving to Mexico—unpatriotically I might add—tax abatements come right back.”

“I feel like this is a really great opportunity to make sure that we’re putting some real nuts and bolts to the plan to make sure that these people that work so hard, for companies, like Carrier, are recognized, and they can’t just get away with walking out the door,” said Macer.

The amendment passed 60-34 and is now eligible for consideration in the House.

Jasmine Otam is a reporter for TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.

 

 

Related News

Indianapolis City-County Council Unanimously Passes $1.2 Billion 2019 Budget
Bipartisan Commission on Infrastructure Meets, Sets Goals
New Indiana Toll Road Deal Gets Final Approval