NewsPublic Affairs / December 3, 2015

Pence Asks Obama Administration To Halt HIP 2.0 Evaluation

Gov. Mike Pence wants the Obama administration to halt an evaluation of the HIP 2.0 program, arguing that the contractor chosen by the federal government is biased against Indiana’s healthcare program.Mike Pence, HIP 2.0, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Urban Institute2015-12-03T00:00:00-05:00
Pence Asks Obama Administration To Halt HIP 2.0 Evaluation

Gov. Mike Pence wants the Obama administration to halt an evaluation of the HIP 2.0 program, arguing that the contractor chosen by the federal government is biased against Indiana’s healthcare program.

file photo

INDIANAPOLIS -- Gov. Mike Pence wants the Obama administration to halt an evaluation of the HIP 2.0 program, arguing that the contractor chosen by the federal government is biased against Indiana’s healthcare program.  The state notes it already hired an independent evaluator to monitor HIP 2.0.

The federal waiver Indiana received earlier this year to operate HIP 2.0 requires the state to hire an independent evaluator for the program.  The state did so months ago and that evaluation is ongoing. 

The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services also chose to hire an independent evaluator.  And Pence has a problem with the feds’ recently unveiled choice, a group called the Urban Institute. 

Specifically, the governor cites an analysis from earlier this year of several states’ healthcare programs in which the Urban Institute criticized some of HIP 2.0’s key components, including its health savings accounts.  Seema Verma, a consultant who’s helped lead the development and implementation of HIP 2.0, says that should be a concern for Hoosiers.

“I think that they should be concerned about a biased evaluation," Verma said. "I think that what we’re looking for is…you know, if there’s going to be an evaluation, it should be a fair evaluation.”

Verma won’t say whether HIP 2.0 would be in danger if the federal evaluation of the program is negative.  But she says the existence of two evaluations – one from the group hired by the state, the other from the feds’ evaluators – creates a confusing situation.

 

 

Related News

Banks Named Chairman Of Subcommittee On Veterans Affairs Technology Modernization
Supreme Court Declines To Hear Nursing Home Moratorium Challenge
New Law Means Builders Must Report Quicker Burning Materials